Seyed Reza Moazzen; Maryam Rastgar; Ali Pirhadi
Abstract
AbstractThis article provides a critical examination of Avicenna's argument concerning the teleology of natural phenomena. Drawing on the concept of the final cause (al-‘illa ...
Read More
AbstractThis article provides a critical examination of Avicenna's argument concerning the teleology of natural phenomena. Drawing on the concept of the final cause (al-‘illa al-ghā’iyya) and the principles of Peripatetic philosophy, Avicenna asserts that natural beings are directed toward specific ends, and this directedness is continuous. The article raises four major objections to Avicenna's argument, three of which are addressed within Avicenna's own works, while the fourth, an epistemological objection, is resolved by appealing to Wittgenstein's notion of hinge propositions. The objections addressed by Avicenna are as follows: 1) Nature lacks a mind and thus cannot conceive of an end, 2) The realization of an end requires choice, yet natural beings lack the capacity for choice, and 3) Natural processes do not cease upon achieving an end, implying that there is no end. Avicenna responds to these objections by distinguishing between intrinsic ends (ghāya bi’l-dhāt) and extrinsic ends (ghāya bi’l-‘araḍ). He argues that intrinsic ends (such as the perpetuation of a species) are never fully realized, whereas extrinsic ends (such as the birth and death of individuals) are necessary for the realization of intrinsic ends but do not themselves cause the cessation of natural processes. The article also employs Avicenna's practical examples to illustrate natural teleology, demonstrating that ends can be achieved without the need for conscious thought or choice. Ultimately, Avicenna's argument on the teleology of natural beings is presented as a defensible and coherent foundation for the philosophy of nature.
