<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Razavi University of Islamic Sciences</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Islamic Philosophical Doctrines</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-9386</Issn>
				<Volume></Volume>
				<Issue>Articles in Press</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>08</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Unity of Theoretical and Practical Reason in the Light of Mulla Sadra's Fuzzy Anthropology</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Unity of Theoretical and Practical Reason in the Light of Mulla Sadra&#039;s Fuzzy Anthropology</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">2227</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30513/ipd.2026.7866.1684</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Kokab</FirstName>
					<LastName>Darabi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy and Islamic Theology, Allameh Hassanzadeh Amoli Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hamed</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ailzadeh</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD student in Transcendental Wisdom, Shahid Motahari Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>03</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This study analyzes the impact of Mulla Sadra&#039;s gradual and fuzzy view of human truth on his final perspective regarding theoretical and practical intellect. Using a descriptive-analytical method and primary sources, the findings indicate that Sadra&#039;s philosophy is founded on the &quot;primacy of existence&quot; as a gradual and hierarchical reality. From this perspective, human being is also a single, hierarchical, and fuzzy truth called &quot;soul&quot; in one respect and &quot;body&quot; in another. The soul emerges from the substantial motion of the body, and their relationship is not dualistic but rather one of &quot;union&quot; and ultimately &quot;unity&quot;—the body is the lower, corporeal level of the soul, and the soul is the higher, spiritual level of the body.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Based on this and the principle that &quot;the soul is, in its unity, all faculties,&quot; the paper argues that a fuzzy view of human being prevents absolute boundaries between the soul&#039;s faculties. Consequently, the common distinction between theoretical intellect ( cognitive faculty) and practical intellect ( motivational faculty) is transformed in Sadra&#039;s thought. They are two dimensions or levels of a single reality called &quot;intellect,&quot; just as soul and body are two levels of a single truth. Thus, theory is considered the higher level of practice, and practice the lower level of theory. The ultimate end of both is the same: attaining existential perfection and divine proximity. This research demonstrates that Sadra&#039;s fuzzy anthropology leads to an ontological unity of soul and body, and consequently, to aIdentity Unity of theoretical and practical intellect.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This study analyzes the impact of Mulla Sadra&#039;s gradual and fuzzy view of human truth on his final perspective regarding theoretical and practical intellect. Using a descriptive-analytical method and primary sources, the findings indicate that Sadra&#039;s philosophy is founded on the &quot;primacy of existence&quot; as a gradual and hierarchical reality. From this perspective, human being is also a single, hierarchical, and fuzzy truth called &quot;soul&quot; in one respect and &quot;body&quot; in another. The soul emerges from the substantial motion of the body, and their relationship is not dualistic but rather one of &quot;union&quot; and ultimately &quot;unity&quot;—the body is the lower, corporeal level of the soul, and the soul is the higher, spiritual level of the body.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Based on this and the principle that &quot;the soul is, in its unity, all faculties,&quot; the paper argues that a fuzzy view of human being prevents absolute boundaries between the soul&#039;s faculties. Consequently, the common distinction between theoretical intellect ( cognitive faculty) and practical intellect ( motivational faculty) is transformed in Sadra&#039;s thought. They are two dimensions or levels of a single reality called &quot;intellect,&quot; just as soul and body are two levels of a single truth. Thus, theory is considered the higher level of practice, and practice the lower level of theory. The ultimate end of both is the same: attaining existential perfection and divine proximity. This research demonstrates that Sadra&#039;s fuzzy anthropology leads to an ontological unity of soul and body, and consequently, to aIdentity Unity of theoretical and practical intellect.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Fuzzy thought</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Sadr al-Mutalahin</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Soul</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Body</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Theoretical reason</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Practical reason</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://ipd.razavi.ac.ir/article_2227_19170a221bf18dc1c012f549551f6970.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
