<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Razavi University of Islamic Sciences</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Islamic Philosophical Doctrines</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-9386</Issn>
				<Volume></Volume>
				<Issue>Articles in Press</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Feasibility Study of "Ethics" in Artificial Intelligence: An Analysis Based on the Principles of "Nature" in the Philosophical Mysticism of Ayatollah Shahabadi</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Feasibility Study of &quot;Ethics&quot; in Artificial Intelligence: An Analysis Based on the Principles of &quot;Nature&quot; in the Philosophical Mysticism of Ayatollah Shahabadi</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">2245</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30513/ipd.2026.8031.1705</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Saeideh Sadat</FirstName>
					<LastName>Shahidi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Dept. of Philosophy &amp; Islamic Theology, Imam Sadiq (a.s.) University, Sisters Campus</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Seyed Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mirlohi</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD student in Jurisprudence &amp; Private Law, Shahid Motahari University</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-1500-8454</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>.This research explores the challenge of &quot;moral agency&quot; in Artificial Intelligence (AI) through the lens of &quot;Nature&quot; in Ayatollah Shahabadi&#039;s philosophical mysticism. While dominant AI ethics paradigms focus on computational, utilitarian, or reinforcement learning models, this paper raises the fundamental question: can an artificial system devoid of divine &quot;Fitrat&quot; possess genuine moral understanding and agency, or is it merely simulating morality?. Using a descriptive-analytical method, the study first explicates the foundations of Fitrat as the root of moral intuition in Shahabadi&#039;s thought, emphasizing five intuitive references: knowledge, love, discovery, comfort, and freedom . Findings indicate that human moral agency is grounded in &quot;presential knowledge&quot; and an &quot;intrinsic inclination toward perfection&quot;. Conversely, the technical analysis reveals that current AI models, relying on mathematical &quot;objective functions&quot; and statistical correlations, lack the conceptual infrastructure for semantic understanding and moral intuition . Through a comparative analysis, the article argues that due to the absence of inner consciousness and innate inclination, AI is, at best, a &quot;simulated moral agent&quot; or a &quot;stochastic parrot&quot; that merely reproduces the appearance of moral behavior. Ultimately, this fundamental distinction between &quot;Innate Ethics&quot; and &quot;Algorithmic Ethics&quot; necessitates redefining AI as a subservient tool rather than an autonomous agent in technological governance.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">.This research explores the challenge of &quot;moral agency&quot; in Artificial Intelligence (AI) through the lens of &quot;Nature&quot; in Ayatollah Shahabadi&#039;s philosophical mysticism. While dominant AI ethics paradigms focus on computational, utilitarian, or reinforcement learning models, this paper raises the fundamental question: can an artificial system devoid of divine &quot;Fitrat&quot; possess genuine moral understanding and agency, or is it merely simulating morality?. Using a descriptive-analytical method, the study first explicates the foundations of Fitrat as the root of moral intuition in Shahabadi&#039;s thought, emphasizing five intuitive references: knowledge, love, discovery, comfort, and freedom . Findings indicate that human moral agency is grounded in &quot;presential knowledge&quot; and an &quot;intrinsic inclination toward perfection&quot;. Conversely, the technical analysis reveals that current AI models, relying on mathematical &quot;objective functions&quot; and statistical correlations, lack the conceptual infrastructure for semantic understanding and moral intuition . Through a comparative analysis, the article argues that due to the absence of inner consciousness and innate inclination, AI is, at best, a &quot;simulated moral agent&quot; or a &quot;stochastic parrot&quot; that merely reproduces the appearance of moral behavior. Ultimately, this fundamental distinction between &quot;Innate Ethics&quot; and &quot;Algorithmic Ethics&quot; necessitates redefining AI as a subservient tool rather than an autonomous agent in technological governance.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ethics of artificial intelligence</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Nature</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ayatollah Shahabadi</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">philosophical mysticism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">moral agency</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://ipd.razavi.ac.ir/article_2245_cbe221a9d79e650f780b00112340fdee.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
