Seyed Muhammad Mousavi Baigi; Muhammad Ishaq Arefi Shirdaghi; Muhammad Maghrebi
Abstract
A rational interpretation of the resurrection has always been one of the major concerns of Muslim philosophers, including Mulla Sadra who was one of the first to take an important step ...
Read More
A rational interpretation of the resurrection has always been one of the major concerns of Muslim philosophers, including Mulla Sadra who was one of the first to take an important step in the rational explanation of physical resurrection by his eleven principles. After Sadra, some Islamic philosophers, such as Allameh Tabataba'i and Khomeini, while accepting Sadrian principles, rejected some of his conclusions and offered a new comment. Imam has accepted only three of the eleven preliminaries of Sadra and speaks firmly about the human body after a seemingly death without a material hylo, and despite Mulla Sadra, explicitly believes that the similitude body is created an example within the body of the mundane. And it is impossible for the hereafter body to be created by the soul Allameh Tabataba'i, while accepting the Zonuzi’s speech, believes that the human body will be revived in the hereafter and move towards the soul and joining it and by this interpretation, has given the soul a more prominent place. Therefore, since Imam Khomeini’s point of view needs less preliminaries and lacks the bodies’ incorporation into the soul’s objection, it is advantageous.
