Ali Mostajeran Gourtani; Majid Sadeqi Hassanabadi
Abstract
The issue of the endurance of dispositions in the context of physical resurrection is analyzed. Mullā Ṣadrā has explained the endurance of dispositions and its existential requirements ...
Read More
The issue of the endurance of dispositions in the context of physical resurrection is analyzed. Mullā Ṣadrā has explained the endurance of dispositions and its existential requirements in the theory of physical resurrection in such a way that many of the scholars after him have expressed their approval for this view, but Muhaqqiq Zonouzī has a different view. He believes that the soul leaves inner effects after death in the worldly body that will be the difference of the bodies after death, which will be the endurance of dispositions in the body and the body moves toward the soul by substantial movement in the physical resurrection, but Mullā Ṣadrā’s theory is based on the capability of the creation of the existential soul. The philosophical principles of Mullā Ṣadrā and Zonouzī by the method of content analysis and description is studied in this research and the conflict will be determined based on the principles of both thinkers. The comparison of the oppinions shows that according to Zonouzī’s interpretation of the parts of the body, an element based on the substantial movement was added to the soul in which dispositions in this process, but according to Mullā Ṣadrā, the human soul, relying on the existential creation and promoting it, will lead to the realization of physical resurrection.
