Document Type : Research
Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, Āl Ṭāhā Institute of Higher Education, Tehran, Iran.
2 Graduate of Level Four (Ph.D. equivalent), Qom Seminary, Qom, Iran.
Abstract
Avicenna and Mullā Ṣadrā both provide coherent programs for spiritual discipline (Riyāḍah) that apparently pursue similar goals. Yet beneath these outward similarities lies a fundamental distinction rooted in their differing anthropological foundations: the soul as a static substance versus the soul as a fluid being in a state of becoming (Ṣayrūrah). Employing an analytical‑comparative approach, this article first examines the fivefold anthropological principles of the two philosophers (the origin of the soul, the perfection of the soul, the role of the body, the levels of the soul, and its relation to the Active Intellect). It then demonstrates how these distinctions affect the pathology of the soul and the prescription of healings. In Avicennian philosophy, the soul is a static substance that employs the body as a temporary instrument, and the levels of the soul are its accidental states. Consequently, the obstacles to the soul’s perfection (psychic diseases) have a “passive” nature, meaning the domination and contamination of this static substance by bodily faculties. In contrast, from Mullā Ṣadrā’s perspective, the soul is the product of substantial motion (al‑Ḥarakah al‑Jawhariyyah) and a reality in a constant state of becoming. Thus, obstacles to perfection acquire an “active and existential” nature, namely the intensification and consolidation of the soul at lower, animal levels of existence. This fundamental difference gives the threefold goals of spiritual discipline-emptying (Takhlīyah), adornment (Taḥliyah), and the refinement of the innermost soul (Talṭīf al‑Sirr)-an ontological interpretation in Transcendent Philosophy, transforming them from a merely purificatory program into tools for substantial perfection. Spiritual discipline in Avicenna’s view is a psychological process for purifying the static substance of the soul, while in Mullā Ṣadrā’s view it is an ontological and existential movement for the flourishing and intensification of the soul on the path toward union with the Intellect and the sacred realm.
Keywords
- Spiritual Discipline (Riyāḍah)
- Soul (Nafs)
- Avicenna (Ibn Sīnā)
- Mullā Ṣadrā
- Substantial Motion (al‑Ḥarakah al‑Jawhariyyah)
- Purification
- Existential Perfection
- Active Intellect
Main Subjects
Al-Sabzavārī (2004). Asrār al-ḥikam fī al-muftataḥ wa al-mukhtatam (Secrets of wisdoms in the beginning and the end). Qom: Maṭbūʿāt-e Dīnī. [In Persian]
Dehqānī, Amīn; Ḥasan Moʿallemī; Masʿūd Esmāʿīlī. (2021). “A Comparative Study of Fanāʾ fī Allāh from the Perspectives of Avicenna, Suhrawardī, and Mullā Ṣadrā.”Islamic Philosophical Doctrines, 16(28), pp. 111–139. https://doi.org/10.30513/ipd.2021.2697.1224 [in Persian]
Ibn Sīnā (1981). Risālah fī taʾthīr al-ziyārah (Treatise on the effect of visitation) (Ẓ. Darī, Trans.). Tehran: Markazī Publishing. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sīnā (1984). Al-Mabdaʾ wa al-maʿād (The origin and the return) (ʿA. Nūrānī, Ed.). Tehran: Institute of Islamic Studies, University of Tehran – McGill University. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sīnā (1985). Al-Qaṣīdah al-muzdawijah (The double ode). Qom: Maktabat Āyat Allāh al-Marʿashī al-Najafī. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sīnā (1987). Al-Inṣāf (The impartial judgment). Kuwait: Wakālat al-Maṭbūʿāt. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sīnā (1991). Risālat al-ṭayr (Treatise on the bird) (Sahlān Sāwī, Commentary). Tehran: Al-Zahrā Publishing. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sīnā (1996). Al-Nafs min kitāb al-Shifāʾ (The soul from The Book of Healing) (Ḥ. Ḥasan-zādah Āmulī, Ed.). Qom: Būstān-e Ketāb. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sīnā (1997). Al-Ilāhiyyāt min kitāb al-Shifāʾ (Metaphysics from The Book of Healing) (Ḥ. Ḥasan-zādah Āmulī, Ed.). Qom: Būstān-e Ketāb. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sīnā (2000). Al-Najāh min al-gharq fī baḥr al-ḍalālāt (Deliverance from drowning in the sea of errors) (M. T. Dānish-Pazhūh, Ed.). The University of Tehran. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sīnā (2002). Al-Ishārāt wa al-tanbīhāt (Remarks and admonitions) (M. Zāreʿī, Ed.). Qom: Būstān-e Ketāb. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sīnā (2007). Aḥwāl al-nafs: A study on the psychic faculties (A. Ahwānī, Ed.). Paris: Dār Biblīyūn. [In Arabic]
Kohansāl, ʿA. R., & Ḥijāzī, M. (2017). An explanation of false asceticism and its effects from the perspective of Islamic philosophy with emphasis on Ṣadrian wisdom. New Theological Teachings, 1. [In Persian]
Mullā Ṣadrā (1975). Al-Mabdaʾ wa al-maʿād (The origin and the return). Tehran: Anjuman-e Ḥekmat va Falsafeh-ye Īrān. [In Arabic]
Mullā Ṣadrā (1981). Asrār al-āyāt wa anwār al-bayyināt (The secrets of the verses and the lights of clear proofs). Tehran: Anjuman-e Ḥekmat-e Islāmī-ye Īrān. [In Arabic]
Mullā Ṣadrā (1982). Al-Shawāhid al-rubūbiyyah fī al-manāhij al-sulūkiyyah (Divine witnesses on spiritual paths). Tehran: Markaz-e Nashr-e Jāmeʿī. [In Arabic]
Mullā Ṣadrā (1982). Īqāẓ al-nāʾimīn (The awakening of the sleepers). Tehran: Institute for Cultural Studies and Research. [In Persian]
Mullā Ṣadrā (1984). Mafātīḥ al-ghayb (Keys to the unseen). Tehran: Institute for Cultural Studies and Research. [In Arabic]
Mullā Ṣadrā (1987). Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-karīm (Commentary on the noble Qurʾān). Qom: Bīdār. [In Arabic]
Mullā Ṣadrā (1989). Al-Ḥikmah al-mutaʿāliyah fī al-asfār al-ʿaqlīyah al-arbaʿah (The transcendent philosophy in the four intellectual journeys). Qom: Maktabat al-Muṣṭafawī. [In Arabic]
Mullā Ṣadrā (2002). Kasr aṣnām al-jāhiliyyah (The breaking of the idols of ignorance). Tehran: Bunyād-e Ḥekmat-e Islāmī-ye Ṣadrā. [In Arabic]
Mūsavī, S. A., & Fanāʾī-Eshkewarī, M. (2015). The status of ascetic discipline in moral education from the perspective of the Qurʾān and ḥadīth. Ethics Research Journal, 8(30), 7-22. [In Persian]
Nāṣirī, M., & Aḥmadpūr, ʿA. (2016). Ascetic discipline: Its types, degrees, and levels. Islamic Mysticism, 13(4). [In Persian]
)