• Register
  • Login
  • Persian

Islamic Philosophical Doctrines

Scientific Journal
  1. Home
  2. A Critical Analysis of Nietzsche’s Self‑Grounded Anthropology Based on the Theory of Fiṭrah in Islamic Theology (With Emphasis on ʿAllāmah Ṭabāṭabāʾī’s Philosophical Interpretation)

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Peer Review Process

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

FAQ

Journal Metrics

News

Related Links

Article processing and publishing costs

A Critical Analysis of Nietzsche’s Self‑Grounded Anthropology Based on the Theory of Fiṭrah in Islamic Theology (With Emphasis on ʿAllāmah Ṭabāṭabāʾī’s Philosophical Interpretation)

    Author

    • Moḥammad Ḥeydarīfard

    Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Studies, Faculty of Basic and Applied Sciences, Kermanshah University of Technology, Kermanshah, Iran.

,

Document Type : Research

10.30513/ipd.2026.8065.1712
  • Article Information
  • References
  • Download
  • How to cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Anthropology occupies a foundational role in Nietzsche’s thought and shapes the basis of many of his ethical views. By denying divine authority and rejecting any fixed essence for the human being, he regards the human as a creature who must himself become the creator of meaning and the values of his own life. From this perspective, fiṭrah or innate dispositions have no meaning in the human being, and he is defined by the will to power. This article, adopting an analytical‑critical approach, first explicates the principal components of Nietzsche’s anthropology and then examines them in light of the theory of fiṭrah in Islamic theology. Subsequently, the theory of fiṭrah is introduced as one of the pillars of Islamic anthropology, and its role in explaining human identity, dispositions, and ultimate end is considered. The findings of the research indicate that Nietzsche’s anthropology, due to its neglect of the innate and divine dimension of the human being, faces challenges in explaining the meaning of life and human dignity, whereas the theory of fiṭrah, by accepting human dynamism while simultaneously affirming the directedness of human existence, offers a more coherent and meaningful picture of the human being.

Keywords

  • Nietzsche
  • anthropology
  • human self‑groundedness
  • fiṭrah
  • Islamic theology
  • will to power

Main Subjects

  • Islamic Philosophy
  • XML
  • PDF 1.24 M
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
References
  1. Agatonović, M. (2025). Nietzsche’s ethics and critique of morality. Springer.
  2. Carollo, B. (2022). Nietzsche and transhumanism: A reassessment. The Agonist, 16(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.33182/agon.v16i2.2800 
  3. Craig, E. (Ed.). (2000). Concise Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy. Routledge.
  4. Faghīhī, Q., Nowrūzī, H., & Javānpūr Harawī, A. (2024). Barrasī‑ye taṭbīqī‑ye andīsheh‑ye siyāsī‑ye Nietzsche va Muṭahharī bā taʾkīd bar mabānī‑ye ensān‑shenākhtī‑ye ānhā (A comparative study of Nietzsche’s and Muṭahharī’s political thought with emphasis on their anthropological foundations). Maʿrefat va Baṣīrat‑e Eslāmī, 4, 44–60. [In Persian]
  5. Huddleston, A. (2024). Nietzsche on values. Philosophy Compass, 19, e70006. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.70006 
  6. Ismāʿīlpūr Niyāzī, H. (2010). Ensān‑shenāsī (Chelcherāgh‑e Ḥekmat, Daftar‑e Dovvom) (Anthropology: The lantern of wisdom, Vol. 2). Kanūn‑e Andīsheh‑ye Javān. [In Persian]
  7. Jawādī, M., ʿAẓīmīdukht, H., Ṣahrāʾī, K., & Qāʾen‑Ibrāhīm‑Ābādī, M. (2025). estinbāṭī az naqsh‑e feṭrat dar maʿrefat‑shenāsī va taḥaqquq‑e feʿl‑e akhlāqī bā takyeh bar āyeh‑ye feṭrat (An analysis of the role of fiṭrah in epistemology and moral action based on the verse of fiṭrah). ʿUlūm‑i Qurʾān va Ḥadīth, 57(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.22067/jquran.2025.86257.1652  [In Persian]
  8. Jawādī Āmulī, ʿA. (2011). Tafsīr‑e mawḍūʿī‑ye Qurʾān‑e Karīm: Feṭrat dar Qurʾān (Thematic exegesis of the Qurʾān: Fiṭrah in the Qurʾān). Qom: Isrāʾ. [In Persian]
  9. Khosrowpanāh, ʿA., & Ismāʿīlpūr Niyāzī, H. (2013). Insān‑shenāsī‑ye Eslāmī (Islamic anthropology). Qom: Maʿāref. [In Persian]
  10. Leffler, O. (2016). The foundations of agency—and ethics? Philosophia, 44, 547–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-016-9702-2 
  11. Lewin, M. (2024). Nietzsche was no perspectivist. Philosophies, 9(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9010009 
  12. Miṣbāḥ Yazdī, M.‑T. (2021). Maʿāref‑e Qurʾān: Khudā‑shenāsī, keyhān‑shenāsī, ensān‑shenāsī (Qurʾānic doctrines: Theology, cosmology, anthropology). Qom: Muʾassaseh‑ye Āmūzeshī va Pazhūheshī‑ye Imām Khomeynī. [In Persian]
  13. Muṭahharī, M. (2022a). Feṭrat. Tehran: Ṣadrā. [In Persian]
  14. Muṭahharī, M. (2022b). Feṭrat dar Qurʾān (Fiṭrah in the Qurʾān) (3rd ed.). Tehran: Ṣadrā. [In Persian]
  15. Nietzsche, F. (2001). The gay science (J. Nauckhoff & A. Del Caro, Trans.; A. Del Caro, Ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  16. Nietzsche, F. (2005). Thus spoke Zarathustra (G. Parkes, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
  17. Nietzsche, F. (2007). Ecce homo: How one becomes what one is (D. Large, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
  18. Nietzsche, F. (2013). Beyond good and evil (H. Zimmern, Trans.). Project Gutenberg.
  19. Nietzsche, F. (2017). On the genealogy of morality and other writings (C. Diethe, Trans.; K. Ansell‑Pearson, Ed.) (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  20. Nietzsche, F. (2019). The will to power (W. Kaufmann & R. J. Hollingdale, Trans.; R. J. Hollingdale, Ed.). Penguin Classics.
  21. Nietzsche, F. (2020). Ḥikmat‑e shādān (The gay science) (M. Ḥājiyān‑Nejād, Trans.). Tehran: Nīk‑Farjām. [In Persian]
  22. Nietzsche, F. (2021). Darbāreh‑ye ḥaqīqat va nā‑ḥaqīqat: Neveshteh‑hā‑ye muntakhab (On truth and lies: Selected writings) (N. Āqā‑Ibrāhīmī, Trans.). Tehran: Tamaddun‑e ʿIlmī. [In Persian]
  23. Nietzsche, F. (2022). Ensānī—Besyār Insānī (Human, all too human) (ʿA. Kashaf, Trans.). Tehran: Farzān‑e Rūz. [In Persian]
  24. Nietzsche, F. (2023). Ghurūb‑e botān (Twilight of the idols) (M. Anṣārī, Trans.). Tehran: Jāmī (Muṣaddeq). [In Persian]
  25. Nietzsche, F. (2024). Farāsū‑ye nīk va bad (Beyond good and evil) (S. Fīrūzābādī, Trans.). Tehran: Jāmī (Muṣaddaq). [In Persian]
  26. Nietzsche, F. (2025a). Chenīn guft Zartusht (Thus spoke Zarathustra) (D. Āshūrī, Trans.). Tehran: Āgāh. [In Persian]
  27. Nietzsche, F. (2025b). Tabār‑shenāsī‑ye akhlāq (On the genealogy of morality) (D. Āshūrī, Trans.). Tehran: Āgāh. [In Persian]
  28. Ūstādī, E., Sharīʿatī‑Neyāsar, H., & Shākerī, S. M. T. (2025). Taḥlīl‑e enteqādī‑ye naẓariyyeh‑ye Sartre darbāreh‑ye feṭrat va tabyīn‑e dīdgāh‑e Qurʾānī (Critical analysis of Sartre’s theory of fiṭrah and explanation of the Qurʾānic perspective). Āmūzeh‑hā‑ye Falsafeh‑ye Eslāmī, 36, 191-224. https://doi.org/10.30513/ipd.2026.7583.1659  [In Persian]
  29. Prescott‑Couch, A. (2024). Nietzsche and the significance of genealogy. Mind, 133(531), 623–650. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzae008 
  30. Rowthorn, D. (2017). Nietzsche’s cultural elitism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 47(1), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2016.1233381 
  31. Leiter, B. (2024). Nietzsche’s moral and political philosophy. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2024 ed.). Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2024/entries/nietzsche-moral-political/ 
  32. Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Harvard University Press.
  33. Ṭabāṭabāʾī, M.‑Ḥ. (1999). Tafsīr al‑Mīzān (The balance in the exegesis of the Qurʾān) (M.‑B. Mūsawī, Trans.). Qom: Daftar‑e Inteshārāt‑e Eslāmī. [In Persian]
  34. Ṭabāṭabāʾī, M.‑Ḥ. (2009). Ensān az āghāz tā anjām (Man from beginning to end). Qom: Būstān‑e Ketāb. [In Persian]
    • Article View: 304
    • PDF Download: 172
Islamic Philosophical Doctrines
Volume 21, Issue 38 - Serial Number 38
June 2026
Pages 155-190
Files
  • XML
  • PDF 1.24 M
History
  • Receive Date: 07 January 2026
  • Revise Date: 19 February 2026
  • Accept Date: 27 April 2026
  • Publish Date: 22 June 2026
Share
How to cite
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
Statistics
  • Article View: 304
  • PDF Download: 172

APA

Ḥeydarīfard, M. (2026). A Critical Analysis of Nietzsche’s Self‑Grounded Anthropology Based on the Theory of Fiṭrah in Islamic Theology (With Emphasis on ʿAllāmah Ṭabāṭabāʾī’s Philosophical Interpretation). Islamic Philosophical Doctrines, 21(38), 155-190. doi: 10.30513/ipd.2026.8065.1712

MLA

Ḥeydarīfard, M. . "A Critical Analysis of Nietzsche’s Self‑Grounded Anthropology Based on the Theory of Fiṭrah in Islamic Theology (With Emphasis on ʿAllāmah Ṭabāṭabāʾī’s Philosophical Interpretation)", Islamic Philosophical Doctrines, 21, 38, 2026, 155-190. doi: 10.30513/ipd.2026.8065.1712

HARVARD

Ḥeydarīfard, M. (2026). 'A Critical Analysis of Nietzsche’s Self‑Grounded Anthropology Based on the Theory of Fiṭrah in Islamic Theology (With Emphasis on ʿAllāmah Ṭabāṭabāʾī’s Philosophical Interpretation)', Islamic Philosophical Doctrines, 21(38), pp. 155-190. doi: 10.30513/ipd.2026.8065.1712

CHICAGO

M. Ḥeydarīfard, "A Critical Analysis of Nietzsche’s Self‑Grounded Anthropology Based on the Theory of Fiṭrah in Islamic Theology (With Emphasis on ʿAllāmah Ṭabāṭabāʾī’s Philosophical Interpretation)," Islamic Philosophical Doctrines, 21 38 (2026): 155-190, doi: 10.30513/ipd.2026.8065.1712

VANCOUVER

Ḥeydarīfard, M. A Critical Analysis of Nietzsche’s Self‑Grounded Anthropology Based on the Theory of Fiṭrah in Islamic Theology (With Emphasis on ʿAllāmah Ṭabāṭabāʾī’s Philosophical Interpretation). Islamic Philosophical Doctrines, 2026; 21(38): 155-190. doi: 10.30513/ipd.2026.8065.1712

  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap

News

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons — Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to the journal newsletter and receive the latest news and updates

© Journal management system. designed by sinaweb