This research has put the negation of the rule of necessity and the principle of causality in Kant’s practical philosophy and post-Kantian theology to the test of Islamic philosophy by a citation method. According to this research, concepts such as transcendental creation, transcendental negation, dialectic, Dasein (existence) and the idea are the watchwords that are the common boundary between the two theological sects of Mu'tazilism (Arabic: المعتزلة al-muʿtazilah or اعتزال iʿtizāl) and Ashʿarism (Arabic: الأشعریة: al-ʾAshʿarīyah, or Ashʿarī) in Islamic theology and two currents of liberal theology and dialectical theology are in Christian theology, and these currents have been inevitably led to the negation of the rule of necessity and the principle of causality, which had no result other than the entering of the imagination of composition in the essence of God, accepting the notion of “the existence of Ajwaf” (Arabic: وجود أجوَف , hollow existence) and preventing Sharia (Arabic: شریعة, Romanized: sharīʿa) law in favor of free will. This was the immediate consequence of the separation of philosophy from the defensive apologetics or the subordination of philosophy to the defensive apologetics in theology according to this research. Returning to the early philosophical order under a monotheistic worldview and subordinating the defensive apologetics to metaphysical philosophy is the suggested solution of this research to solve the issue.
ابن سینا، ابوعلی حسین بن عبداللّٰه، الهیات شفا (دانشنامه علائی)، مقدمه و تصحیح محمد معین، چاپ دوم، همدان ـ تهران، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا ـ انجمن آثار و مفاخر فرهنگی، 1383 ش. (الف)
Crouter, Richard, Friedrich Schleiermacher: Between Enlightenment and Romanticism, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels, “Stoicism in Early Christianity”, in: John Sellars (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of the Stoic Tradition, Taylor & Francis Group, 2016.
Grant, Frederick Clifton, “St. Paul and Stoicism”, The Biblical World, Vol. 45(5), The University of Chicago Press Journals, May 1915, Stable URL: <https://www.jstor.org/ stable/3142715>.
Heidegger, Martin, Being & Time, Translated by: John Macquarrie & Edward Robinson, Oxford, 1962.
Heron, A.I.C., “Barth, Schleiermacher and task of dogmatics”, HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, Vol. 56(2/3), 2000.
Kant, Immanuel, The Critique of Pure Reason, Translated by John Miller Dow Meiklejohn, New York, Mineola, 2003.
Krijnen, Christian, “The Problem of Schematism in Kant and its Transformation in Southwest Neo-Kantianism”, Kant Yearbook, Vol. 12(1), 2020, <https://doi.org/10.15.15/ Kantyb-2020-0004>.
Rastovic, Molis, “Kant’s Understanding of the Imagination in Critique of Pure Reason”, E-LOGOS: Electronic Journal for Philosophy, Vol. 20(1), University of Economic Prague, 2013.
Bouzarinejad, Y., Parsania, H., & Rafiei Atani, F. (2022). A Critique of the Rule of Necessity in Kant’s Philosophy and Post-Kantian Theology from the Perspective of Islamic Philosophy. Islamic Philosophical Doctrines, 17(30), 51-77. doi: 10.30513/ipd.2023.3591.1306
MLA
Yahya Bouzarinejad; Hamid Parsania; Fatemeh Rafiei Atani. "A Critique of the Rule of Necessity in Kant’s Philosophy and Post-Kantian Theology from the Perspective of Islamic Philosophy". Islamic Philosophical Doctrines, 17, 30, 2022, 51-77. doi: 10.30513/ipd.2023.3591.1306
HARVARD
Bouzarinejad, Y., Parsania, H., Rafiei Atani, F. (2022). 'A Critique of the Rule of Necessity in Kant’s Philosophy and Post-Kantian Theology from the Perspective of Islamic Philosophy', Islamic Philosophical Doctrines, 17(30), pp. 51-77. doi: 10.30513/ipd.2023.3591.1306
VANCOUVER
Bouzarinejad, Y., Parsania, H., Rafiei Atani, F. A Critique of the Rule of Necessity in Kant’s Philosophy and Post-Kantian Theology from the Perspective of Islamic Philosophy. Islamic Philosophical Doctrines, 2022; 17(30): 51-77. doi: 10.30513/ipd.2023.3591.1306
)