• Register
  • Login
  • Persian

Islamic Philosophical Doctrines

Scientific Journal
  1. Home
  2. A Critical Assessment of Gholamreza Fayyāḍī’s Critiques of Avicenna’s Arguments for the Immateriality of the Rational Soul

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Peer Review Process

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

FAQ

Journal Metrics

News

Related Links

Article processing and publishing costs

A Critical Assessment of Gholamreza Fayyāḍī’s Critiques of Avicenna’s Arguments for the Immateriality of the Rational Soul

    Authors

    • Mahmoud Saidi 1
    • Mohammadreza Farahmadkia 2

    1 Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy and Islamic Theology, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran

    2 PhD Graduate, Department of Philosophy and Islamic Theology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

,

Document Type : Research

10.30513/ipd.2025.7488.1647
  • Article Information
  • References
  • Download
  • How to cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

In Islamic philosophy, the discussion of the immateriality of the soul (Tajarrud al-Nafs) constitutes one of the most fundamental and complex topics in philosophical anthropology, which has consistently engaged the attention of Muslim philosophers. Thinkers such as Avicenna, adducing various proofs, sought to demonstrate the immateriality of the soul. However, in the contemporary era, certain scholars—including Ayatollah Fayyāḍī—have undertaken a critical re-examination of these proofs, scrutinizing their foundations and premises and casting doubt upon their validity and completeness. Adopting an analytical-critical approach, the present research investigates the most significant critiques advanced by Fayyāḍī concerning Avicenna’s arguments for the soul’s immateriality. Among these critiques are the following: doubt concerning the indivisibility of intelligible forms, denial of the necessary connection between immateriality and indivisibility, challenge to the self-evidence of the distinction between degrees of perceptual intensity, rejection of the existential distinction between sensory and intellectual faculties based on the criterion of immateriality, dismissal of the “Flying Man” argument as unreal, objection to the manner in which cognitive forms are individuated given their attribution to a particular subject, and finally, denial of the correlation between immateriality and unity on the one hand and materiality and multiplicity on the other. The findings of this research indicate that most of these critiques suffer from serious logical and epistemological flaws and lack the demonstrative force to refute Avicenna’s cogent proofs for the immateriality of the soul. Consequently, the final analysis of this study emphasizes that the classical arguments of Islamic philosophy concerning the soul’s immateriality, despite certain challenges, retain their requisite coherence and demonstrative strength, and Fayyāḍī’s critiques lack the logical sufficiency to invalidate them.

Keywords

  • Immateriality of the Soul (Tajarrud al-Nafs)
  • Proofs of Immateriality
  • Critique and Analysis
  • Fayyāḍī
  • Avicenna

Main Subjects

  • Islamic Philosophy
  • XML
  • PDF 1.27 M
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
References
The Holy Qurʾān. 
Al-Farghānī, S. al-D. (2000). Mashāriq al-Darārī: Sharḥ Tāʾiyyat Ibn al-Fāriḍ (The Rising Places of Pearls: Commentary on Ibn al-Fāriḍ's Tāʾiyyah) (S. J. al-D. Āshtiyānī, Ed.). Qom: Daftar-e Tablīghāt-e Islāmī. [In Persian]
Al-Ḥillī, Ḥ. ibn Y. (1992). Kashf al-Murād fī Sharḥ Tajrīd al-Iʿtiqād (The Unveiling of Intention in Commentary on Tajrīd al-Iʿtiqād). Qom: Jāmiʿah-ye Mudarrisīn. [In Arabic]
Al-Muhaymī, ʿA. ibn A. (2008). Mashraʿ al-Khuṣūṣ ilā Maʿānī al-Nuṣūṣ (The Watering Place of Particularity Concerning the Meanings of Texts). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah. [In Arabic]
Al-Qayṣarī, D. ibn M. (2003). Sharḥ Fuṣūṣ al-Ḥikam (Commentary on the Bezels of Wisdom). Qom: Būstān-e Ketāb. [In Arabic]
Al-Qūnawī, Ṣ. al-D. (1993). Sharḥ al-Arbaʿīn Ḥadīth (Commentary on Forty Traditions) (M. Bīdārfar, Ed.). Qom: Bīdār. [In Arabic]
Al-Qūnawī, Ṣ. al-D. (2002). Iʿjāz al-Bayān fī Tafsīr Umm al-Qurʾān (The Inimitability of Expression in the Interpretation of Mother of the Qurʾān) (S. J. al-D. Āshtiyānī, Ed.). Qom: Daftar-e Tablīghāt-e Islāmī. [In Arabic]
Al-Qūnawī, Ṣ. al-D. (2003). Al-Nuṣūṣ fī Taḥqīq al-Ṭawr al-Makhṣūṣ (Texts on the Verification of the Particular Mode). Alexandria: Manshaʾat al-Maʿārif. [In Arabic]
Al-Qūnawī, Ṣ. al-D. (2007). Al-Nafaḥāt al-Ilāhiyyah (The Divine Breaths). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah. [In Arabic]
Al-Qūnawī, Ṣ. al-D. (2013). Al-Fukūk fī Asrār Mustanadāt al-Fuṣūṣ (The Undoing Concerning the Secrets of the Foundations of the Fuṣūṣ). Beirut: Nashirūn. [In Arabic]
Al-Rāghib al-Iṣfahānī, Ḥ. ibn M. (1991). Mufradāt Alfāẓ al-Qurʾān (Vocabulary of Qurʾānic Terms). Beirut: Dār al-Qalam. [In Arabic]
Al-Sabzawārī, H. (1990). Sharḥ al-Manẓūmah (Commentary on the Philosophical Poem). Tehran: Nashr-e Nāb. [In Arabic]
Al-Tirmidhī, M. ibn ʿĪ. (1998). Sunan al-Tirmidhī (The Traditions of al-Tirmidhī). Tehran: Dār al-Ḥadīth. [In Arabic]
Āshtiyānī, S. J. al-D. (1991). Sharḥ-e Muqaddimeh-ye Qayṣarī (Commentary on Qayṣarī’s introduction). Tehran: Amīr Kabīr. [In Persian]
Avicenna (1983). Al-Ishārāt wa al-Tanbīhāt (Remarks and admonitions). Qom: Nashr al-Balāghah. [In Arabic]
Avicenna (1984a). Al-Ilāhiyyāt min Kitāb al-Shifāʾ (Metaphysics of The Book of Healing). Qom: Maktabat Āyat Allāh al-Marʿashī al-Najafī. [In Arabic]
Avicenna (1984b). Al-Taʿlīqāt (Annotations). Qom: Maktabat al-Iʿlām al-Islāmī. [In Arabic]
Aznīqī, M. ibn Q. al-D. (2016). Fatḥ Miftāḥ al-Ghayb (The Opening of the Key to the Unseen). Tehran: Sukhan. [In Persian]
Ḥasan-zādah Āmulī, Ḥ. (1999). Mumidd al-Himam fī Sharḥ Fuṣūṣ al-Ḥikam (The Aid of Aspirations in Commentary on the Bezels of Wisdom). Tehran: Vizārat-e Farhang va Ershād-e Eslāmī. [In Persian]
Ḥasan-zādah Āmulī, Ḥ. (2008). Durūs-e Sharḥ-e Fuṣūṣ al-Ḥikam (Qayṣarī) (Lessons on the Commentary of the Bezels of Wisdom by Qayṣarī). Qom: Būstān-i Kitāb. [In Persian]
Ibn Manẓūr, M. ibn M. (1993). Lisān al-ʿArab (The Tongue of the Arabs). Beirut: Dār Ṣādir. [In Arabic]
Jāmī, ʿA. R. (1991). Naqd al-Nuṣūṣ fī Sharḥ Naqsh al-Fuṣūṣ (Critique of Texts in Commentary on the Imprint of the Bezels) (W. C. Chittick, Ed.). Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian]
Jundī, M. al-D. (2002). Sharḥ Fuṣūṣ al-Ḥikam (Commentary on the Bezels of Wisdom) (S. J. al-D. Āshtiyānī, Ed.). Qom: Būstān-e Ketāb. [In Arabic]
Mullā Ṣadrā (1982). Īqāẓ al-Nāʾimīn (The Awakening of the Sleepers). Tehran: Anjuman-e Shāhanshāhī-ye Falsafeh-ye Īrān. [In Arabic]
Mullā Ṣadrā (1984). Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb (Keys to the Unseen). Tehran: Institute for Cultural Studies and Research. [In Arabic]
Mullā Ṣadrā (1989). Al-Ḥikmah al-Mutaʿālīyah fī al-Asfār al-ʿaqlīyah al-Arbaʿah (The Transcendent Philosophy in the Four Intellectual Journeys). Qom: Maktabat al-Muṣṭafawī. [In Arabic]
Payāndeh, A. (2003). Nahj al-Faṣāḥah: Majmūʿeh-ye Sukhanān-e Payāmbar-e Islām (ṣ) (The Path of Eloquence: A Collection of the Sayings of the Prophet of Islam). Tehran: Dunyā-ye Dānesh. [In Persian]
Ṭabāṭabāʾī, M. Ḥ. (1995). Nihāyah al-Ḥikmah (The Ultimate of Wisdom). Qom: Muʾassasat al-Nashr al-Islāmī. [In Arabic]
    • Article View: 394
    • PDF Download: 277
Islamic Philosophical Doctrines
Volume 20, Issue 36 - Serial Number 36
June 2025
Pages 261-284
Files
  • XML
  • PDF 1.27 M
History
  • Receive Date: 18 September 2025
  • Revise Date: 04 October 2025
  • Accept Date: 21 October 2025
  • Publish Date: 22 June 2025
Share
How to cite
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
Statistics
  • Article View: 394
  • PDF Download: 277

APA

Saidi, M. and Farahmadkia, M. (2025). A Critical Assessment of Gholamreza Fayyāḍī’s Critiques of Avicenna’s Arguments for the Immateriality of the Rational Soul. Islamic Philosophical Doctrines, 20(36), 261-284. doi: 10.30513/ipd.2025.7488.1647

MLA

Saidi, M. , and Farahmadkia, M. . "A Critical Assessment of Gholamreza Fayyāḍī’s Critiques of Avicenna’s Arguments for the Immateriality of the Rational Soul", Islamic Philosophical Doctrines, 20, 36, 2025, 261-284. doi: 10.30513/ipd.2025.7488.1647

HARVARD

Saidi, M., Farahmadkia, M. (2025). 'A Critical Assessment of Gholamreza Fayyāḍī’s Critiques of Avicenna’s Arguments for the Immateriality of the Rational Soul', Islamic Philosophical Doctrines, 20(36), pp. 261-284. doi: 10.30513/ipd.2025.7488.1647

CHICAGO

M. Saidi and M. Farahmadkia, "A Critical Assessment of Gholamreza Fayyāḍī’s Critiques of Avicenna’s Arguments for the Immateriality of the Rational Soul," Islamic Philosophical Doctrines, 20 36 (2025): 261-284, doi: 10.30513/ipd.2025.7488.1647

VANCOUVER

Saidi, M., Farahmadkia, M. A Critical Assessment of Gholamreza Fayyāḍī’s Critiques of Avicenna’s Arguments for the Immateriality of the Rational Soul. Islamic Philosophical Doctrines, 2025; 20(36): 261-284. doi: 10.30513/ipd.2025.7488.1647

  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap

News

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons — Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to the journal newsletter and receive the latest news and updates

© Journal management system. designed by sinaweb