Document Type : Research

Authors

1 PhD Candidate, Department of Islamic Studies, Faculty of Humanities, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Islamic Studies, Faculty of Humanities, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

This research undertakes a critical re-reading of the conceptual metaphor of the “cage” (Qafas) in the tenth verse of Avicenna’s Al-Qaṣīdah al-ʿAyniyyah. Despite the widespread consensus among commentators interpreting the “cage” as the material body, this interpretation proves incompatible with the dual role of the body in Avicenna’s psychology, wherein the body is simultaneously an aid to and an obstacle for the soul. Accordingly, the primary question of this research is: assuming this incompatibility, what does the “cage” metaphorically represent in this verse, and how can this apparent contradiction be resolved? The findings of this research demonstrate that the “cage” does not represent the body itself, but rather serves as a conceptual metaphor for the soul’s preoccupation with the body and the epistemic obstacles arising from this preoccupation. This redefinition, through a systematic analysis of metaphorical mappings and reliance on a network-based reading of Avicenna’s works, resolves the aforementioned incompatibility and enables a more coherent understanding of the body’s place in his thought. Finally, by tracing the origin of this metaphor and comparing it with preceding intellectual traditions, it is concluded that the present reading is not an imitation of Platonic and Neoplatonic traditions, but rather a creative re-appropriation grounded in Avicenna’s independent philosophical system.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Abbaszadeh, A., & Nabavi‑Nia, M. (2023). “An examination of the most important arguments for the refutation of reincarnation and the necessity of employing the concept of time in Mullā Ṣadrā's proof,” Hekmat‑e Sadraei Biannual Journal, 11(2), 99–112. [In Persian]
Barnes, J. (1978). David Gallop (trans.), Plato: Phaedo. Clarendon Plato Series. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press, 1975, 245 pp. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 8(2), 397–419.
Carra de Vaux, B. (1899). “La Ḳaṣīdah d'Avicenne sur l'âme.” Journal Asiatique 9(14), 157–173.
Corbin, H. (1954). Avicenna and the visionary recital (Mythos Series). Princeton University Press.
Cornelli, G. (2019). “Separation of body and soul in Plato’s Phaedo: An unprecedented ontological operation in the affinity argument.” In Psychology and ontology in Plato (pp. 23–31). Springer International Publishing.
Dawson, C. (2009). Understanding Europe: The Works of Christopher Dawson. CUA Press.
De Smet, D. (2002). “Avicenne et l'ismaélisme post-fatimide, selon la Risāla al-Mufīda fī īḍāḥ mulġaz al-Qaṣīda de ʿAlī b. Muḥammad b. al-Walīd (ob. 1215).” In Acts of the international colloquium Leuven-Louvain-la-Neuve (pp. 1–20). Leuven University Press.
De Souza Pereira, R. H. (2010). “Avicena e a filosofia oriental: história de uma controvérsia.” Revista de Filosofia Aurora, 22(30), 217–245.
De Vogel, C. J. (1988). Rethinking Plato and Platonism (Vol. 92). Brill.
Fathollahi, A., & Nazari, A. (2009). “The symbolism of Avicenna’s al-Qaṣīdah al-ʿAyniyyah and its reflection in the thought of Muslim mystics.” Pazhuhesh‑e Zabān va Adabiyāt‑e Fārsi 14, 1–26. [In Persian]
Gadazgar, H. (1992). “Symbolic narratives in Avicenna’s philosophical thought.” Falsafeh wa Kalām Monthly (Keyhān‑e Andīsheh) 46, 86–106. [In Persian]
Harris, R. B. (2002). Neoplatonism and contemporary thought: Part one (Vol. 1). SUNY Press.
Hawi, S. (1974). Islamic naturalism and mysticism: A philosophic study of Ibn Ṭufayl's Ḥayy ibn Yaqẓān. Brill.
Heath, P. (1992). Allegory and Philosophy in Avicenna (Ibn Sīnā) with a Translation of the Book of the Prophet Muhammad’s Ascent to Heaven. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Avicenna (1953). Rasāʾil Ibn Sīnā [The treatises of Avicenna]. Ibrāhīm Khurūz. [In Arabic]
Avicenna (1985). Al-Shifāʾ (al-Ṭabīʿiyyāt) [The Healing: Physics]. Ayatollah Marʿashī Najafī Publishing House. [In Arabic]
Avicenna (1992). Al-Mubāḥathāt [The Discussions]. Bidārfar. [In Arabic]
Avicenna (2004). Risālat al-Nafs [Treatise on the Soul]. Bu-Ali Sina University. [In Arabic]
Avicenna (2007). Aḥwāl al-Nafs [States of the Soul]. Dār Biblīyūn. [In Arabic]
Iqbal Ashtiyani, A., & Raoufi Mehr, A. (2024). Translation and commentary on Avicenna’s al-Qaṣīdah al-ʿAyniyyah. Noor-e Eshrāq Publishing. [In Persian]
Jalali, A. (2005). “A comparison of Avicenna’s al-Qaṣīdah al-ʿAyniyyah with Ferdowsi’s Bijan and Manijeh.” Pak-Noor Journal 12, 82–96. [In Persian]
Kemal, S. (2012). The philosophical poetics of Alfarabi, Avicenna and Averroes: The Aristotelian reception. Routledge.
Khādimī, ʿA., Ibrāhīmī, R., Ghanavati, A., & Isḥāqī Nasab, A. (2024). “An analysis of the interaction between soul and body in the process of the soul’s perfection from Avicenna’s perspective, with a focus on the al-Qaṣīdah al-ʿAyniyyah.” Hekmat-e Sīnawī Journal, 116–136. https://doi.org/10.30497/ap.2024.246669.1690 [In Persian]
Khalīf, F. (1974). Ibn Sīnā wa Madhhabuhu fī al-Nafs [Avicenna and His Doctrine of the Soul]. Arab University of Beirut. [In Arabic]
Khatami, M. (2017). An Introduction to Comparative Philosophy. ʿElm Publishing. [In Persian]
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1969). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors We Live by. University of Chicago Press.
Lawson, T. (2005). Reason and Inspiration in Islam: Theology, Philosophy and Mysticism in Muslim Thought. I.B. Tauris.
Mayer, T., & Madelung, W. (2015). Avicenna’s Allegory on the Soul: An Ismaili Interpretation. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Mokhtari Khoyi, M. (2024). “Plato in the Shadow of Aristotle: On the Reasons for the Neglect of Plato’s Works During the Translation Movement.” Teachings of Islamic Philosophy, 239–258. https://doi.org/10.30513/ipd.2025.7199.1626 [In Persian]
Moqarrabi, N., & Hesamarfar, ʿA. (2014). “Cocoon and Butterfly: A Comparative Evaluation of Avicenna’s and Mullā Ṣadrā’s Views on the Relationship between Soul and Body.” Kheradnāmeh‑ye Ṣadrā, 73–86. [In Persian]
Nasr, S. H. (1993). An Introduction to Islamic Cosmological Doctrines. SUNY Press.
Nightingale, A. (2021). Philosophy and Religion in Plato’s Dialogues. Cambridge University Press.
Samīʿzadeh, R. (2011). “A Study of Avicenna’s al-ʿAyniyyah and Rūmī’s Ney-Nāmeh.” Lisān-i Mubīn Scientific-Research Quarterly 4, 44–59. [In Persian]
Schwarz, H. (2000). Eschatology. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.
Seifi, M., & Lotfi Mofrad Niasari, F. (2012). “A Comparative Study of Two Mystical al-ʿAyniyyah Odes by Avicenna and ʿAlī Ṭarīq Aram Nasīb ʿArīḍa.” Lisān-i Mubīn Journal 8, 140–158. [In Persian]
Siyavoshi, S., & Ghorbani, S. (2018). A contentual and structural analysis of two al-ʿAyniyyah odes by Avicenna and Mohammad Reza Hakimi. Naqd-i Adabī wa Sabk-shināsī. [In Persian]
Slaveva-Griffin, S. (2025). The omnipresence of Plotinus’s One in its emanations. [Manuscript in preparation/published—please verify].
Stroumsa, S. (1992). “Avicenna’s Philosophical Stories: Aristotle’s Poetics Reinterpreted.” Arabica 39 (Fasc. 2), 183–206.
Turner, J. D. (2025). Sethian Gnosticism and the Platonic Tradition. Presses de l'Université Laval.
Zoller, C. P. (2018). Plato and the Body: Reconsidering Socratic Asceticism. State University of New York Press.