A comparative study of the mediation scope of cosmological proofs and Siddikin's proof

Document Type : Scientific extension

Authors

1 University of Religions and Denominations

2 teacher

Abstract

Undoubtedly, the issue of proving the existence and attributes of God has always been one of the concerns of philosophers and theologians, therefore, they have established many proofs such as the proof of movement, the proof of occurrence, the proof of necessity and possibility, and the proof of the Siddiquis to prove the essential nature of God.

The aforementioned arguments can be divided into two categories: "Cosmological-Ontological"; These proofs have different degrees in terms of precision and strength in proving the essence and breadth in proving God's attributes, since the comprehensiveness, correctness, and value of a claim or a belief depends on the validity and limited implications of the reason that was established to prove it. In this research, we have shown by a comparative analysis of the aforementioned proofs that the Siddikin proof is one of the most important and complete proofs of God's existence, and its realm of evidence is wider than the proofs of names and attributes compared to cosmological proofs, thus this proof is the only proof. In addition to proving God's existence by proving all His attributes, it makes us unnecessary to present other proofs.

Keywords

Islamic Philosophical Doctrines

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 06 July 2024

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics